Google ChomeOS Tablet specs leaked, implications abound

 

UK-based ibtimes got their hands on the specs to one of Google’s new ChromeOS Netbooks that they’ll reportedly sell direct rather than through resellers (though it isn’t had to see mobile carriers subsidizing the product, especially Tmobile and Verizon in the US).  They say Google may subsidize it as well, and they’d have to if they want to put the reported $300 price tag on the device.

The specs reveal some interesting directions that Google is going with their product.  This particular model is based on an Nvidia Tegra-based ARM processor which has a lot of graphics horsepower.  This is the same line of chips that Microsoft’s Zune uses and it will at the very least be able to play 720P video, but very likely will be able to display 1080P, at least on an external display.  It will also be good for gaming – as much as can be expected for the ChromeOS which is mostly based on Web technologies.

Also interesting to note that Google is choosing an ARM platform over Intel (at least on this particular spec).  As I’ve noted before, ARM has a efficient power-usage footprint compared to Intel’s Atom while providing similar performance.

Ibtimes also states:

It is also rumoured that the netbook will sport a 10.1-inch TFT HD-ready multi-touch display, and would come with 64GB SSD (mind you, not HDD), 2GB RAM and other bells and whistles such as WiFi, 3G, Bluetooth, Ethernet port, USB ports, webcam, 3.5mm audio jack, multi-card reader, etc.

“10-inch multi-touch display?”  Maybe.  If Apple’s tablet hasn’t used all of those by then.  That spec is incredibly similar to what people have been saying about Apple’s tablet and if Google’s netbook has a Multi-Touch display, it isn’t a netbook at all.  It is a tablet.

“HD Ready” means 720P to me.  We’re looking at 1366×768 or thereabouts.  As I said before the hardware will have no problem of playing HD content.

The 64GB SSD is a very interesting spec as well.  Google’s ChromeOS is supposed to house everything in the Cloud, so the product should only need a few GB for the OS.  Why the very expensive and expansive 64GB SSD?

Likely it will be used to store media offline – which means not everything will be streamed from the net.  Also, your huge offline GMail databases will need to live somewhere as well.  That being said, I’d think 32GB would be a good size for starters, especially when a 64GB SSD would likely be over half the cost of the product.

This is interesting not only because Google is effectively building a tablet and using ARM as opposed to Intel.  It also means that Apple’s rumored tablet will also be competing with a Google product.  These two once friendly companies are now looking to be the biggest competitors in the tech world.

OLPC Plans Super-Thin, Super-Cheap Tablet

The nonprofit group One Laptop Per Child wants to produce a touchscreen tablet computer by 2012 that will cost less than $100. OLPC released its device roadmap this week, which includes two upgrades to the original XO computer, as well as lofty plans for a new 8.5-by-11-inch tablet device called the XO-3.

The XO-3’s specs

The design for the XO-3 is ambitious. The tablet would be about 0.24-inch thick (half the thickness of the iPhone), with an 8.5-by-11-inch screen, a virtual keyboard, no buttons at all, and a folding ring for easy carrying. It would be made entirely of plastic, and is designed to be durable and waterproof.

The device would use Palm Pre-style induction charging, so it would use less than a Watt of power, according to Forbes. There’s no word on software, but the XO-3 would have an 8-GHz processor.

As if those specs weren’t enough of a lofty goal, OLPC’s founder Nicholas Negroponte told Forbes the XO-3’s “less than $100” target price would be $75–the same number OLPC wanted to hit with its earlier two-screen tablet concept called the XO-2, which has now been scrapped in favor of the XO-3.

Lofty Ambitions

OLPC hopes it won’t have to develop the XO-3 alone, and that computer manufacturers will take the lead in developing the device. To that end, OLPC will work on the XO-3 as an open platform that any manufacturer can take over, according to Forbes.

Still, the hardest part for the XO-3 may not be its lofty specs, but its $75 price tag. The original XO fell far short of its $100 price point at $199, and that was for a mere rethinking of existing laptop designs and components. The XO-3, by comparison, would have a more powerful processor than most laptops available today (assuming the 8-GHz spec is not a typo), require significantly less power consumption and use many technologies that are still prohibitively expensive.

Take, for example, Plastic Logic’s Que e-reader, which is a real device that has similar hardware specs as the XO-3 concept. However, Plastic Logic has been reluctant to reveal the price for the Que, but it’s become clear the all-plastic, super-thin e-reader will not be cheap. Then there’s the JooJoo aka CrunchPad tablet, which was planned on hitting a $200 price tag, and is now selling for $500.

The XO-3 sounds like a great idea, but it’s doubtful OLPC will be able to make its dreams a reality by 2012. But the group doesn’t necessarily have to get all the way to its goal. Negroponte told Forbes if OLPC only achieves half of the XO-3 concept, the resulting device could be a game changer with far reaching consequences.

Other OLPC Plans

In addition to the XO-3, OLPC announced two updates to the original XO laptop:

XO 1.5 – The XO 1.5 is the same industrial design as the XO 1.0. Based on a VIA processor (replacing AMD), it will provide 2x the speed, 4x DRAM memory and 4x FLASH memory. It will run both the Linux and Windows operating systems. XO 1.5 will be available in January 2010 at about $200 per unit.

XO 1.75 – The XO 1.75, to be available in early 2011, will be essentially the same industrial design but rubber-bumpered on the outside and in the inside will be an 8.9″, touch-sensitive display. The XO 1.75 will be based on an ARM processor from Marvell that will enable 2x the speed at 1/4 the power and is targeted at $150 or less.